Oxpecker 1.1.1
See the version list below for details.
dotnet add package Oxpecker --version 1.1.1
NuGet\Install-Package Oxpecker -Version 1.1.1
<PackageReference Include="Oxpecker" Version="1.1.1" />
paket add Oxpecker --version 1.1.1
#r "nuget: Oxpecker, 1.1.1"
// Install Oxpecker as a Cake Addin #addin nuget:?package=Oxpecker&version=1.1.1 // Install Oxpecker as a Cake Tool #tool nuget:?package=Oxpecker&version=1.1.1
render_with_liquid: false
Oxpecker
Oxpecker is an F# framework based on ASP.NET Core Endpoint routing (similar to Minimal APIs, so they are competitors) with easy to comprehend API, mostly inherited from Giraffe framework.
Nuget package dotnet add package Oxpecker
Examples can be found here
Performance tests reside here
Documentation:
An in depth functional reference to all of Oxpecker's features.
Table of contents
- Fundamentals
- Basics
- Web Request Processing
- Testing
Fundamentals
Core concepts
Oxpecker is built on top of the ASP.NET Core Endpoint Routing and provides some convenient DSL for F# users.
When using Oxpecker, make sure you are familiar with ASP.NET Core and it's concepts, since Oxpecker reuses a lot of built-in functionality.
EndpointHandler
The main building block in Oxpecker is an EndpointHandler
:
type EndpointHandler = HttpContext -> Task
an EndpointHandler
is a function which takes HttpContext
, and returns a Task
when finished.
EndpointHandler
function has full control of the incoming HttpRequest
and the resulting HttpResponse
. It closely follows RequestDelegate signature, but in F# style.
EndpointHandler
normally should be regarded as a terminal handler, meaning that it should write some result in response (but not necessary, as described in composition section).
EndpointMiddleware
type EndpointMiddleware = EndpointHandler -> HttpContext -> Task
EndpointMiddleware
is similar to EndpointHandler
, but accepts the next EndpointHandler
as first parameter.
Each EndpointMiddleware
can process an incoming HttpRequest
before passing it further down the Oxpecker pipeline by invoking the next EndpointMiddleware
or short circuit the execution by returning the Task
itself.
EndpointHandler vs EndpointMiddleware
So, when should you define one or another? The answer lies in the responsibility of your handler:
- If you want to conditionally return response or proceed further in pipeline use
EndpointMiddleware
. Good example is Preconditional endpoint middleware - If you want to execute some logic after the next handler completes - use
EndpointMiddleware
- In other cases use
EndpointHandler
Oxpecker pipeline vs. ASP.NET Core pipeline
The Oxpecker pipeline is a (sort of) functional equivalent of the (object oriented) ASP.NET Core pipeline. The ASP.NET Core pipeline is defined by middlewares, and EndpointMiddleware
is similar to regular middleware and EndpointHandler
is similar to terminal middleware.
If the Oxpecker pipeline didn't process an incoming HttpRequest
(because no route was matched) then other ASP.NET Core middleware can still process the request (e.g. static file middleware or another web framework plugged in after Oxpecker).
This architecture allows F# developers to build rich web applications through a functional composition of EndpointMiddleware
and EndpointHandler
functions while at the same time benefiting from the wider ASP.NET Core eco system by making use of already existing ASP.NET Core middleware.
The Oxpecker pipeline is plugged into the wider ASP.NET Core pipeline through the OxpeckerMiddleware
itself and therefore an addition to it rather than a replacement.
Ways of creating a new EndpointHandler and EndpointMiddleware
There's multiple ways how one can create a new EndpointHandler
in Oxpecker.
The easiest way is to re-use an existing EndpointHandler
function:
let sayHelloWorld : EndpointHandler = text "Hello World, from Oxpecker"
You can also add additional parameters before returning an existing EndpointHandler
function:
let sayHelloWorld (name: string) : EndpointHandler =
let greeting = sprintf "Hello World, from %s" name
text greeting
If you need to access the HttpContext
object then you'll have to explicitly return an EndpointHandler
function which accepts an HttpContext
object and returns a Task
:
let sayHelloWorld : EndpointHandler =
fun (ctx: HttpContext) ->
let name =
ctx.TryGetQueryValue "name"
|> Option.defaultValue "Oxpecker"
let greeting = sprintf "Hello World, from %s" name
text greeting ctx
The most verbose version of defining a new EndpointHandler
function is by explicitly returning a Task
. This is useful when an async operation needs to be called from within an EndpointHandler
function:
type Person = { Name : string }
let sayHelloWorld : EndpointHandler =
fun (ctx: HttpContext) ->
task {
let! person = ctx.BindJson<Person>()
let greeting = sprintf "Hello World, from %s" person.Name
return! text greeting ctx
}
EndpointMiddleware
is constructed very similarly to EndpointHandler
, but it accepts an additional EndpointHandler
as the first parameter:
let tryCatchMW : EndpointMiddleware =
fun (next: EndpointHandler) (ctx: HttpContext) ->
task {
try
return! next ctx
with
| ex ->
ctx.Response.StatusCode <- 500
return! text (sprintf "An error occurred: %s" ex.Message) ctx
}
Deferred execution of Tasks
Please be also aware that a Task<'T>
in .NET is just a promise of 'T
when a task eventually finishes asynchronously. Unless you define an EndpointHandler
function in the most verbose way (with the task {}
CE) and actively await a nested result with either let!
or return!
then the handler will not wait for the task to complete before returning to the OxpeckerMiddleware
.
This has important implications if you want to execute code in an EndpointHandler
after returned task completes, such as cleaning up resources with the use
keyword. For example, in the code below, the IDisposable
will get disposed before the actual response is returned. This is because a EndpointHandler
is a HttpContext -> Task
and therefore text "Hello" ctx
only returns a Task
which hasn't been completed yet:
let doSomething : EndpointHandler =
fun ctx ->
use __ = somethingToBeDisposedAtTheEndOfTheRequest
text "Hello" ctx
However, by explicitly invoking the text
from within a task {}
CE one can ensure that the text
gets executed before the IDisposable
gets disposed:
let doSomething : EndpointHandler =
fun (ctx: HttpContext) ->
task {
use __ = somethingToBeDisposedAtTheEndOfTheRequest
return! text "Hello" ctx
}
Composition
Handler composition
The fish operator (>=>) combines two functions into one.
It can compose
EndpointMiddleware
andEndpointMiddleware
EndpointMiddleware
andEndpointHandler
EndpointHandler
andEndpointHandler
It is an important combinator in Oxpecker which allows composing many smaller functions into a bigger web application:
There is no limit to how many functions can be chained with the fish operator:
let app =
route "/" (
setHttpHeader "X-Foo" "Bar"
>=> setStatusCode 200
>=> text "Hello World"
)
The idea is that every function can decide: short-circuit pipeline or proceed. For EndpointMiddleware
it's choice whether to call next or not, and for EndpointHandler
it's to start writing a response or not.
If you would like to learn more about the origins of the >=>
(fish) operator then please check out Scott Wlaschin's blog post on Railway oriented programming.
routef
function doesn't work with fish operator directly, so additional operators where added for route readability
routef "/{%s}" (setStatusCode 200 >>=> handler)
routef "/{%s}/{%s}" (setStatusCode 200 >>=>+ handler)
routef "/{%s}/{%s}/{%s}" (setStatusCode 200 >>=>++ handler)
Bind composition
bindQuery
, bindForm
, bindJson
helpers can be composed with handlers
route "/test" (bindQuery handler)
routef
requires additional operators for composition with bind* functions as well
routef "/{%s}" (bindQuery << handler)
routef "/{%s}/{%s}" (bindForm <<+ handler)
routef "/{%s}/{%s}/{%s}" (bindJson <<++ handler)
Multi-route handler
Sometimes you want to use some generic handler or middleware not only with one route, but with the whole collection of routes. It is possible using applyBefore
and applyAfter
functions. For example:
let MY_HEADER = applyBefore (setHttpHeader "my" "header")
let webApp = [
MY_HEADER <| subRoute "/auth" [
route "/open" handler1
route "/closed" handler2
]
]
Continue vs. Return
In Oxpecker there are two scenarios which a given EndpointMiddleware
or EndpointHandler
can use:
- Continue with next handler
- Return early
Continue
An example is a hypothetical middleware, which sets a given HTTP header and afterwards always calls into the next
http handler:
let setHttpHeader key value : EndpointMiddleware =
fun (next: HttpFunc) (ctx: HttpContext) ->
ctx.SetHttpHeader key value
next ctx
A middleware performs some actions on the HttpRequest
and/or HttpResponse
object and then invokes the next
handler to continue with the pipeline.
It can also be implemented as an EndpointHandler
:
let setHttpHeader key value : EndpointHandler =
fun (ctx: HttpContext) ->
ctx.SetHttpHeader key value
Task.CompletedTask
If such a handler is used in the middle of the pipeline, the next handler will be invoked, because the ctx.Response.HasStarted
will return false.
If it will reside in the end of the pipeline, then the response will start anyway, since there's no next handler to be invoked.
Return early
Sometimes an EndpointHandler
or EndpointMiddleware
wants to return early and not continue with the remaining pipeline.
A typical example would be an authentication or authorization handler, which would not continue with the remaining pipeline if a user wasn't authenticated. Instead it might want to return a 401 Unauthorized
response:
let checkUserIsLoggedIn : EndpointMiddleware =
fun (next: EndpointHandler) (ctx: HttpContext) ->
if isNotNull ctx.User && ctx.User.Identity.IsAuthenticated then
next ctx
else
setStatusCode 401 ctx
Task.CompletedTask
In the else
clause the checkUserIsLoggedIn
handler returns a 401 Unauthorized
HTTP response and skips the remaining EndpointHandler
pipeline by not invoking next
but an already completed task.
If you were to have an EndpointMiddleware
defined with the task {}
CE then you could rewrite it in the following way:
let checkUserIsLoggedIn : EndpointMiddleware =
fun (next: EndpointHandler) (ctx: HttpContext) ->
task {
if isNotNull ctx.User && ctx.User.Identity.IsAuthenticated then
return! next ctx
else
return ctx.SetStatusCode 401
}
It is also possible to implement this using EndpointHandler
, however the response has to be explicitly started:
let checkUserIsLoggedIn : EndpointHandler =
fun (ctx: HttpContext) ->
if isNotNull ctx.User && ctx.User.Identity.IsAuthenticated then
Task.CompletedTask
else
ctx.SetStatusCode 401
text "Unauthorized" ctx // start response
Basics
Plugging Oxpecker into ASP.NET Core
Install the Oxpecker NuGet package:
PM> Install-Package Oxpecker
Create a web application and plug it into the ASP.NET Core middleware:
open Oxpecker
// usually your application consists of several routes
let webApp = [
route "/" <| text "Hello world"
route "/ping" <| text "pong"
]
// sometimes it can only be a single route
let webApp1 = route "/" <| "Hello Oxpecker"
// or it can only be a single "MultiEndpoint" route
let webApp2 = GET [
route "/" <| "Hello Oxpecker"
]
let configureApp (appBuilder: IApplicationBuilder) =
appBuilder
.UseRouting()
.UseOxpecker(webApp) // Add Oxpecker to the ASP.NET Core pipeline, should go after UseRouting
//.UseOxpecker(webApp1) will work
//.UseOxpecker(webApp2) will also work
|> ignore
let configureServices (services: IServiceCollection) =
services
.AddRouting()
.AddOxpecker() // Register default Oxpecker dependencies
|> ignore
[<EntryPoint>]
let main _ =
let builder = WebApplication.CreateBuilder(args)
configureServices builder.Services
let app = builder.Build()
configureApp app
app.Run()
0
Dependency Management
ASP.NET Core has built in dependency management which works out of the box with Oxpecker.
Registering Services
Registering services is done the same way as it is done for any other ASP.NET Core web application:
let configureServices (services : IServiceCollection) =
// Add default Oxpecker dependencies
services.AddOxpecker() |> ignore
// Add other dependencies
// ...
Retrieving Services
Retrieving registered services from within a Oxpecker EndpointHandler
function can be done through the built in service locator (RequestServices
) which comes with an HttpContext
object:
let someHandler : EndpointHandler =
fun (ctx: HttpContext) ->
let fooBar =
ctx.RequestServices.GetService(typeof<IFooBar>)
:?> IFooBar
// Do something with `fooBar`...
// Return a Task
Oxpecker has an additional HttpContext
extension method called GetService<'T>
to make the code less cumbersome:
let someHandler : EndpointHandler =
fun (ctx: HttpContext) ->
let fooBar = ctx.GetService<IFooBar>()
// Do something with `fooBar`...
// Return a Task
There's a handful more extension methods available to retrieve a few default dependencies like an IWebHostEnvironment
or ILogger
object which are covered in the respective sections of this document.
Functional DI
However, if you prefer to use a more functional approach to dependency injection, you shouldn't use container based approach, but rather follow the Env strategy.
The approach is described in the article https://medium.com/@lanayx/dependency-injection-in-f-the-missing-manual-d376e9cafd0f , and to see how it looks in practice, you can refer to the CRUD example in the repository.
Multiple Environments and Configuration
ASP.NET Core has built in support for working with multiple environments and configuration management, which both work out of the box with Oxpecker.
Additionally Oxpecker exposes a GetHostingEnvironment()
extension method which can be used to easier retrieve an IWebHostEnvironment
object from within an EndpointHandler
function:
let someHandler : EndpointHandler =
fun (ctx: HttpContext) ->
let env = ctx.GetHostingEnvironment()
// Do something with `env`...
// Return a Task
Configuration options can be retrieved via the GetService<'T>
extension method:
let someHandler : EndpointHandler =
fun (ctx: HttpContext) ->
let settings = ctx.GetService<IOptions<MySettings>>()
// Do something with `settings`...
// Return a Task
If you need to access the configuration when configuring services, you can access it like this:
let configureServices (services: IServiceCollection) =
let serviceProvider = services.BuildServiceProvider()
let settings = serviceProvider.GetService<IConfiguration>()
// Configure services using the `settings`...
services.AddOxpecker() |> ignore
Logging
ASP.NET Core has a built in Logging API which works out of the box with Oxpecker.
Logging from within an EndpointHandler function
You can retrieve an ILogger
object (which can be used for logging) through the GetLogger<'T>()
or GetLogger (categoryName : string)
extension methods:
let someHandler : EndpointHandler =
fun (ctx: HttpContext) ->
// Retrieve an ILogger through one of the extension methods
let loggerA = ctx.GetLogger<ModuleName>()
let loggerB = ctx.GetLogger("someHandler")
// Log some data
loggerA.LogCritical("Something critical")
loggerB.LogInformation("Logging some random info")
// etc.
// Return a Task
Error Handling
Oxpecker doesn't have a built in error handling or not found handling mechanisms, since it can be easily implemented using following functions that should be registered before and after the Oxpecker middleware:
// error handling middleware
let errorHandler (ctx: HttpContext) (next: RequestDelegate) =
task {
try
return! next.Invoke(ctx)
with
| :? ModelBindException
| :? RouteParseException as ex ->
let logger = ctx.GetLogger()
logger.LogWarning(ex, "Unhandled 400 error")
ctx.SetStatusCode StatusCodes.Status400BadRequest
return! ctx.WriteHtmlView(errorView 400 (string ex))
| ex ->
let logger = ctx.GetLogger()
logger.LogError(ex, "Unhandled 500 error")
ctx.SetStatusCode StatusCodes.Status500InternalServerError
return! ctx.WriteHtmlView(errorView 500 (string ex))
} :> Task
// not found terminal middleware
let notFoundHandler (ctx: HttpContext) =
let logger = ctx.GetLogger()
logger.LogWarning("Unhandled 404 error")
ctx.SetStatusCode 404
ctx.WriteHtmlView(errorView 404 "Page not found!")
///...
let configureApp (appBuilder: IApplicationBuilder) =
appBuilder
.UseRouting()
.Use(errorHandler) // Add error handling middleware BEFORE Oxpecker
.UseOxpecker(endpoints)
.Run(notFoundHandler) // Add not found middleware AFTER Oxpecker
Web Request Processing
Oxpecker comes with a large set of default HttpContext
extension methods as well as default EndpointHandler
functions which can be used to build rich web applications.
HTTP Headers
Working with HTTP headers in Oxpecker is plain simple. The TryGetHeaderValue (key: string)
extension method tries to retrieve the value of a given HTTP header and then returns either Some string
or None
:
let someHandler : EndpointHandler =
fun (ctx: HttpContext) ->
let someValue =
match ctx.TryGetHeaderValue "X-MyOwnHeader" with
| None -> "default value"
| Some headerValue -> headerValue
// Do something with `someValue`...
// Return a Task
Setting an HTTP header in the response can be done via the SetHttpHeader (key: string) (value: obj)
extension method:
let someHandler : EndpointHandler =
fun (ctx: HttpContext) ->
ctx.SetHttpHeader "X-CustomHeader" "some-value"
// Do other stuff...
// Return a Task
You can also set an HTTP header via the setHttpHeader
http handler:
let customHeader : EndpointHandler =
setHttpHeader "X-CustomHeader" "Some value"
let webApp = [
route "/foo" (customHeader >=> text "Foo")
]
Please note that these are additional Oxpecker functions which complement already existing HTTP header functionality in the ASP.NET Core framework. ASP.NET Core offers higher level HTTP header functionality through the ctx.Request.GetTypedHeaders()
method.
HTTP Verbs
Oxpecker exposes a set of functions which can filter a request based on the request's HTTP verb:
GET
POST
PUT
PATCH
DELETE
HEAD
OPTIONS
TRACE
CONNECT
There is an additional GET_HEAD
handler which can filter an HTTP GET
and HEAD
request at the same time.
Filtering requests based on their HTTP verb can be useful when implementing a route which should behave differently based on the verb (e.g. GET
vs. POST
):
let submitFooHandler : EndpointHandler =
// Do something
let submitBarHandler : EndpointHandler =
// Do something
let webApp = [
// Filters for GET requests
GET [
route "/foo" <| text "Foo"
route "/bar" <| text "Bar"
]
// Filters for POST requests
POST [
route "/foo" <| submitFooHandler
route "/bar" <| submitBarHandler
]
]
If you need to check the request's HTTP verb from within an EndpointHandler
function then you can use the default ASP.NET Core HttpMethods
class:
open Microsoft.AspNetCore.Http
let someHandler : EndpointHandler =
fun (ctx: HttpContext) ->
if HttpMethods.IsPut ctx.Request.Method then
// Do something
else
// Do something else
// Return a Task
The GET_HEAD
is a special function which can be used to enable GET
and HEAD
requests on a resource at the same time. This can be very useful when caching is enabled and clients might want to send HEAD
requests to check the ETag
or Last-Modified
HTTP headers before issuing a GET
.
You can also create custom combinations of HTTP verbs by using the applyHttpVerbsToEndpoints
function:
let GET_HEAD_OPTIONS: Endpoint seq -> Endpoint =
applyHttpVerbsToEndpoints(Verbs [ HttpVerb.GET; HttpVerb.HEAD; HttpVerb.OPTIONS ])
let webApp = [
GET_HEAD_OPTIONS [
route "/foo" <| text "Foo"
route "/bar" <| text "Bar"
]
]
HTTP Status Codes
Setting the HTTP status code of a response can be done either via the SetStatusCode (httpStatusCode: int)
extension method or with the setStatusCode (statusCode: int)
function:
let someHandler : EndpointHandler =
fun (ctx: HttpContext) ->
ctx.SetStatusCode 200
// Return a Task
// or...
let someHandler : EndpointHandler =
setStatusCode 200
>=> text "Hello World"
Routing
Oxpecker offers several routing functions to accommodate the majority of use cases. Note, that Oxpecker routing is sitting on the top of ASP.NET Core endpoint routing, so all routes are case insensitive.
route
The simplest form of routing can be done with the route
http handler:
let webApp = [
route "/foo" <| text "Foo"
route "/bar" <| text "Bar"
]
routef
If a route contains user defined parameters then the routef
http handler can be handy:
let fooHandler first last age : EndpointHandler =
fun (ctx: HttpContext) ->
(sprintf "First: %s, Last: %s, Age: %i" first last age
|> text) ctx
let webApp = [
routef "/foo/{%s:maxlength(8)}/{%s}/{%i}" fooHandler
routef "/bar/{%O:guid}" (fun (guid: Guid) -> text (string guid))
]
The routef
http handler takes two parameters - a format string and an EndpointHandler
function. The built-in ASP.NET route constraints are fully supported as well.
The format string supports the following format chars:
Format Char | Type |
---|---|
%b |
bool |
%c |
char |
%s |
string |
%i |
int |
%d |
int64 |
%f |
float /double |
%u |
uint64 |
%O:guid |
Guid |
Note: routef
handler can only handle up to 5 route parameters. It's not recommended to use more than 3 parameters in a route, but if you really need a lot, you can use route
with EndpointHandler
function that utilizes .TryGetRouteValue
extension.
route "/{a}/{b}/{c}/{d}/{e}/{f}" (fun ctx ->
let a = ctx.TryGetRouteValue("a") |> Option.defaultValue ""
let b = ctx.TryGetRouteValue("b") |> Option.defaultValue ""
let c = ctx.TryGetRouteValue("c") |> Option.defaultValue ""
let d = ctx.TryGetRouteValue("d") |> Option.defaultValue ""
let e = ctx.TryGetRouteValue("e") |> Option.defaultValue ""
let f = ctx.TryGetRouteValue("f") |> Option.defaultValue ""
text (sprintf "%s %s %s %s %s %s", a b c d e f) ctx
)
subRoute
It lets you categorise routes without having to repeat already pre-filtered parts of the route:
let webApp =
subRoute "/api" [
subRoute "/v1" [
route "/foo" <| text "Foo 1"
route "/bar" <| text "Bar 1"
]
subRoute "/v2" [
route "/foo" <| text "Foo 2"
route "/bar" <| text "Bar 2"
]
]
In this example the final URL to retrieve "Bar 2" would be http[s]://your-domain.com/api/v2/bar
.
addMetadata
It lets you add metadata to a route which can be used later on in the pipeline:
let webApp =
GET [
route "/foo" (text "Foo") |> addMetadata "foo"
]
configureEndpoint
This function allows you to configure an endpoint using ASP.NET .With*
extension methods:
let webApp =
GET [
route "/foo" (text "Foo")
|> configureEndpoint
_.WithMetadata("foo")
.WithDisplayName("Foo")
]
Catch-all route
You can leverage the templating system of ASP.NET core routing with Oxpecker to define catch-all routes with both route
and routef
functions by using asterisk * or double asterisk **:
let webApp =
GET [
route "/foo/{*bar}" (fun ctx ->
text (ctx.TryGetRouteValue("bar") |> Option.defaultValue "") ctx)
routef "/moo/{**%s}" (fun bar -> text bar)
]
Query Strings
Working with query strings is very similar to working with HTTP headers in Oxpecker. The TryGetQueryValue (key : string)
extension method tries to retrieve the value of a given query string parameter and then returns either Some string
or None
:
let someHandler : EndpointHandler =
fun (ctx: HttpContext) ->
let someValue =
match ctx.TryGetQueryValue "q" with
| None -> "default value"
| Some q -> q
// Do something with `someValue`...
// Return a Task
You can also access the query string through the ctx.Request.Query
object which returns an IQueryCollection
object which allows you to perform more actions on it.
Last but not least there is also an HttpContext
extension method called BindQuery<'T>
which lets you bind an entire query string to an object of type 'T
(see Binding Query Strings).
Model Binding
Oxpecker offers out of the box a few default HttpContext
extension methods and equivalent EndpointHandler
functions which make it possible to bind the payload or query string of an HTTP request to a custom object.
Binding JSON
The BindJson<'T>()
extension method can be used to bind a JSON payload to an object of type 'T
:
[<CLIMutable>]
type Car = {
Name : string
Make : string
Wheels : int
Built : DateTime
}
let submitCar : EndpointHandler =
fun (ctx: HttpContext) ->
task {
// Binds a JSON payload to a Car object
let! car = ctx.BindJson<Car>()
// Sends the object back to the client
return! ctx.Write <| TypedResults.Ok car
}
let webApp = [
GET [
route "/" <| text "index"
route "ping" <| text "pong"
]
POST [
route "/car" submitCar
]
]
Alternatively you can also use the bindJson<'T>
http handler:
[<CLIMutable>]
type Car = {
Name : string
Make : string
Wheels : int
Built : DateTime
}
let webApp = [
GET [
route "/" <| text "index"
route "ping" <| text "pong"
]
POST [
route "/car" (bindJson<Car> (fun car -> %TypedResults.Ok car))
]
]
Both, the HttpContext
extension method as well as the EndpointHandler
function will try to create an instance of type 'T
regardless if the submitted payload contained a complete representation of 'T
or not. The parsed object might only contain partial data (where some properties might be null
) and additional null
checks might be required before further processing.
Please note that in order for the model binding to work the record type must be decorated with the [<CLIMutable>]
attribute, which will make sure that the type will have a parameterless constructor.
The underlying JSON serializer can be configured as a dependency during application startup (see JSON).
Binding Forms
The BindForm<'T>
extension method binds form data to an object of type 'T
:
[<CLIMutable>]
type Car = {
Name : string
Make : string
Wheels : int
Built : DateTime
}
let submitCar : EndpointHandler =
fun (ctx: HttpContext) ->
task {
// Binds a form payload to a Car object
let! car = ctx.BindForm<Car>()
// or with a CultureInfo:
let british = CultureInfo.CreateSpecificCulture("en-GB")
let! car2 = ctx.BindForm<Car>(british)
// Sends the object back to the client
return! ctx.Write <| Ok car
}
let webApp = [
GET [
route "/" <| text "index"
route "ping" <| text "pong"
]
POST [ route "/car" submitCar ]
]
Alternatively you can use the bindForm<'T>
http handlers:
[<CLIMutable>]
type Car = {
Name : string
Make : string
Wheels : int
Built : DateTime
}
let webApp = [
GET [
route "/" <| text "index"
route "ping" <| text "pong"
]
POST [
route "/car" (bindForm<Car> (fun model -> %Ok model))
]
]
Just like in the previous examples the record type must be decorated with the [<CLIMutable>]
attribute in order for the model binding to work.
The underlying model binder is configured as a dependency during application startup:
let configureServices (services : IServiceCollection) =
// First register all default Oxpecker dependencies
services.AddOxpecker() |> ignore
// Now register custom model binder
services.AddSingleton<IModelBinder>(CustomModelBinder()) |> ignore
// or use default model binder, but with different options
services.AddSingleton<IModelBinder>(ModelBinder(specificOptions)) |> ignore
Binding Query Strings
The BindQuery<'T>
extension method binds query string parameters to an object of type 'T
:
[<CLIMutable>]
type Car = {
Name : string
Make : string
Wheels : int
Built : DateTime
}
let submitCar : EndpointHandler =
fun (ctx: HttpContext) ->
// Binds the query string to a Car object
let car = ctx.BindQuery<Car>()
// or with a CultureInfo:
let british = CultureInfo.CreateSpecificCulture("en-GB")
let car2 = ctx.BindQuery<Car>(british)
// Sends the object back to the client
ctx.Write <| Ok car
let webApp = [
GET [
route "/" <| text "index"
route "ping" <| text "pong"
route "/car" <| submitCar
]
]
Alternatively you can use the bindQuery<'T>
http handler:
[<CLIMutable>]
type Car = {
Name : string
Make : string
Wheels : int
Built : DateTime
}
let webApp = [
GET [
route "/" <| text "index"
route "ping" <| text "pong"
]
POST [
route "/car" (bindQuery<Car> (fun model -> %Ok model))
]
]
Just like in the previous examples the record type must be decorated with the [<CLIMutable>]
attribute in order for the model binding to work.
The underlying model binder is configured as a dependency during application startup (see Binding Forms)
Model validation
Oxpecker diverges from the Giraffe's approach to model validation and embraces the traditional ASP.NET Core model validation based on System.ComponentModel.DataAnnotations.Validator
(link).
While you might still need to do complex validation inside your domain, the built-in DTO model validation is still useful for the API boundary.
You have 3 ways to validate your model:
- Directly using
validateModel
function - Using
ctx.BindAndValidate*
extension methods (similar toctx.Bind*
) - Using
bindAndValidate*
handlers (similar tobind*
)
Inside handler you'll need to match ValidationResult
to handle both valid and invalid cases:
open System.ComponentModel.DataAnnotations
[<CLIMutable>]
type Car = {
[<Required>]
Name: string
[<Required>]
Make: string
[<Range(1, 10)>]
Wheels: int
Built: DateTime
}
let addCar : EndpointHandler =
fun (ctx: HttpContext) ->
task {
match! ctx.BindAndValidateJson<Car>() with
| ValidationResult.Valid car ->
return! ctx.Write <| Ok car
| ValidationResult.Invalid (invalidCar, errors) ->
return! ctx.Write <| BadRequest errors.All
}
If you are using server-side rendering using Oxpecker.ViewEngine
, you can leverage special ModelState
[<RequireQualifiedAccess>]
type ModelState<'T> =
| Empty
| Valid of 'T
| Invalid of InvalidModel<'T>
This type is intended to be used for create/edit pages to simplify passing validation data to the view. An example of usage can be found in the ContactApp example.
File Upload
ASP.NET Core makes it really easy to process uploaded files.
The HttpContext.Request.Form.Files
collection can be used to process one or many small files which have been sent by a client:
let fileUploadHandler : EndpointHandler =
fun (ctx: HttpContext) ->
match ctx.Request.HasFormContentType with
| false ->
ctx.Write <| BadRequest()
| true ->
ctx.Request.Form.Files
|> Seq.fold (fun acc file -> $"{acc}\n{file.FileName}") ""
|> ctx.WriteText
let webApp = [ route "/upload" fileUploadHandler ]
You can also read uploaded files by utilizing the IFormFeature
and the ReadFormAsync
method:
let fileUploadHandler : EndpointHandler =
fun (ctx: HttpContext) ->
task {
let formFeature = ctx.Features.Get<IFormFeature>()
let! form = formFeature.ReadFormAsync CancellationToken.None
return!
form.Files
|> Seq.fold (fun acc file -> $"{acc}\n{file.FileName}") ""
|> ctx.WriteText
}
let webApp = [ route "/upload" fileUploadHandler ]
For large file uploads it is recommended to stream the file in order to prevent resource exhaustion.
See also large file uploads in ASP.NET Core on StackOverflow.
WebSockets
Oxpecker's doesn't provide any additional wrappers and fully relies on ASP.NET Core WebSocket support:
let configureApp (appBuilder: IApplicationBuilder) =
appBuilder
.UseRouting()
.UseOxpecker(webApp) // Add Oxpecker
.UseWebSockets() // Add WebSockets
|> ignore
Grpc
Oxpecker's doesn't provide any additional wrappers and fully relies on ASP.NET Core Grpc support. However, to generate classes from .proto
files you need to create a C# project. So, here is a list of steps:
- Create a new C# project, add your
.proto
file(s) there (also reference required packages likeGrpc.Tools
,Grpc.Core
andGoogle.Protobuf
) - Build the C# project, make sure build succeeds
- Reference the C# project from your F# project containing Oxpecker's API
- Implement the Grpc service in F# using generated classes. Example:
type GreeterService() =
inherit Greeter.GreeterBase()
override _.SayHello (request, _) =
HelloReply(Message = $"Hello {request.Name}") |> Task.FromResult
- Add
Grpc.AspNetCore.Server
NuGet package to the F# project - Configure the Grpc service in the F# project:
let configureServices (services: IServiceCollection) =
services
// other dependencies
.AddGrpc() // Register GRPC dependencies
|> ignore
[<EntryPoint>]
let main args =
let builder = WebApplication.CreateBuilder(args)
configureServices builder.Services
let app = builder.Build()
app.MapGrpcService<GreeterService>() |> ignore // expose Grpc endpoint
app.Run()
0
Authentication and Authorization
Oxpecker's security model is the same as Minimal API security model, please make sure you are very familiar with it.
The main difference is that in Oxpecker you can conveniently call configureEndpoint _.RequireAuthorization
on both a single endpoint and a group of endpoints.
let webApp = [
// single endpoint
route "/" (text "Hello World")
|> configureEndpoint
_.DisableAntiforgery()
.RequireAuthorization()
// endpoint group
GET [
route "/index" <| text "index"
route "/ping" <| text "pong"
] |> configureEndpoint _.RequireAuthorization(
AuthorizeAttribute(AuthenticationSchemes = "MyScheme")
)
]
Conditional Requests
Conditional HTTP headers (e.g. If-Match
, If-Modified-Since
, etc.) are a common pattern to improve performance (web caching), to combat the lost update problem or to perform optimistic concurrency control when a client requests a resource from a web server.
Oxpecker offers the validatePreconditions
endpoint handler which can be used to run HTTP pre-validation checks against a given ETag
and/or Last-Modified
value of an incoming HTTP request:
let someHandler (eTag : string)
(lastModified : DateTimeOffset)
(content : string) =
let eTagHeader = Some (EntityTagHelper.createETag eTag)
validatePreconditions eTagHeader (Some lastModified) >=> text content
The validatePreconditions
middleware takes in two optional parameters - an eTag
and a lastMofified
date time value - which will be used to validate a conditional HTTP request. If all conditions can be met, or if no conditions have been submitted, then the next
http handler (of the Oxpecker pipeline) will get invoked. Otherwise, if one of the pre-conditions fails or if the resource hasn't changed since the last check, then a 412 Precondition Failed
or a 304 Not Modified
response will get returned.
The ETag (Entity Tag) value is an opaque identifier assigned by a web server to a specific version of a resource found at a URL. The Last-Modified value provides a timestamp indicating the date and time at which the origin server believes the selected representation was last modified.
Oxpecker's validatePreconditions
endpoint middleware validates the following conditional HTTP headers:
If-Match
If-None-Match
If-Modified-Since
If-Unmodified-Since
The If-Range
HTTP header will not get validated as part the validatePreconditions
http handler, because it is a streaming specific check which gets handled by Oxpecker's Streaming functionality.
Alternatively Oxpecker exposes the HttpContext
extension method ValidatePreconditions(eTag, lastModified)
which can be used to create a custom conditional endpoint middleware. The ValidatePreconditions
method takes the same two optional parameters and returns a result of type Precondition
.
The Precondition
union type contains the following cases:
Case | Description and Recommended Action |
---|---|
NoConditionsSpecified |
No validation has taken place, because the client didn't send any conditional HTTP headers. Proceed with web request as normal. |
ConditionFailed |
At least one condition couldn't be satisfied. It is advised to return a 412 status code back to the client (you can use the HttpContext.PreconditionFailedResponse() method for that purpose). |
ResourceNotModified |
The resource hasn't changed since the last visit. The server can skip processing this request and return a 304 status code back to the client (you can use the HttpContext.NotModifiedResponse() method for that purpose). |
AllConditionsMet |
All pre-conditions were satisfied. The server should continue processing the request as normal. |
The validatePreconditions
http handler as well as the ValidatePreconditions
extension method will not only validate all conditional HTTP headers, but also set the required ETag
and/or Last-Modified
HTTP response headers according to the HTTP spec.
Both functions follow latest HTTP guidelines and validate all conditional headers in the correct precedence as defined in RFC 2616.
Example of HttpContext.ValidatePreconditions
:
// Pass an optional eTag and lastModified timestamp into the handler, because generating an eTag might require to load the entire resource into memory and therefore this is not something which should be done on every request.
let someHttpHandler eTag lastModified : EndpointHandler =
fun (ctx: HttpContext) ->
task {
match ctx.ValidatePreconditions(eTag, lastModified) with
| ConditionFailed -> return ctx.PreconditionFailedResponse()
| ResourceNotModified -> return ctx.NotModifiedResponse()
| AllConditionsMet | NoConditionsSpecified ->
// Continue as normal
// Do stuff
}
let webApp = [
route "/" <| text "Hello World"
route "/foo" <| someHttpHandler None None
]
Response Writing
Sending a response back to a client in Oxpecker can be done through a small range of HttpContext
extension methods and their equivalent EndpointHandler
functions.
Writing Bytes
The WriteBytes (data: byte array)
extension method and the bytes (data: byte array)
endpoint handler both write a byte array
to the response stream of the HTTP request:
let someHandler (data: byte array) : EndpointHandler =
fun (ctx: HttpContext) ->
task {
// Do stuff
return! ctx.WriteBytes data
}
// or...
let someHandler (data: byte array) : EndpointHandler =
// Do stuff
bytes data
Both functions will also set the Content-Length
HTTP header to the length of the byte array
.
The bytes
http handler (and it's HttpContext
extension method equivalent) is useful when you want to create your own response writing function for a specific media type which is not provided by Oxpecker yet.
For example Oxpecker doesn't have any functionality for serializing and writing a YAML response back to a client. However, you can reference another third party library which can serialize an object into a YAML string and then create your own yaml
http handler like this:
let yaml (x: obj) : EndpointHandler =
setHttpHeader "Content-Type" "text/yaml"
>=> bytes (x |> YamlSerializer.toYaml |> Encoding.UTF8.GetBytes)
Writing Text
The WriteText (str : string)
extension method and the text (str: string)
endpoint handler will write string to response in UTF8 format and also set the Content-Type
HTTP header to text/plain
in the response:
let someHandler (str: string) : EndpointHandler =
fun (ctx: HttpContext) ->
task {
// Do stuff
return! ctx.WriteText str
}
// or...
let someHandler (str: string) : EndpointHandler =
// Do stuff
text str
Writing JSON
The WriteJson<'T> (dataObj : 'T)
extension method and the json<'T> (dataObj: 'T)
endpoint handler will both serialize an object to a JSON string and write the output to the response stream of the HTTP request. They will also set the Content-Length
HTTP header and the Content-Type
header to application/json
in the response:
let someHandler (animal: Animal) : EndpointHandler =
fun (ctx: HttpContext) ->
task {
// Do stuff
return! ctx.WriteJson animal
}
// or...
let someHandler (animal: Animal) : EndpointHandler =
// Do stuff
json animal
The WriteJsonChunked<'T> (dataObj: 'T)
extension method and the jsonChunked (dataObj: 'T)
endpoint handler write directly to the response stream of the HTTP request without extra buffering into a byte array. They will not set a Content-Length
header and instead set the Transfer-Encoding: chunked
header and Content-Type: application/json
:
let someHandler (person: Person) : EndpointHandler =
fun (ctx: HttpContext) ->
task {
// Do stuff
return! ctx.WriteJsonChunked person
}
// or...
let someHandler (person: Person) : EndpointHandler =
// Do stuff
jsonChunked person
The underlying JSON serializer is configured as a dependency during application startup and defaults to System.Text.Json
(when you write services.AddOxpecker()
). You can implement IJsonSerializer
interface to plug in custom JSON serializer.
let configureServices (services : IServiceCollection) =
// First register all default Oxpecker dependencies
services.AddOxpecker() |> ignore
// Now register custom serializer
services.AddSingleton<IJsonSerializer>(CustomSerializer()) |> ignore
// or use default STJ serializer, but with different options
services.AddSingleton<IJsonSerializer>(
SystemTextJsonSerializer(specificOptions)) |> ignore
Writing IResult
If you like what ASP.NET Core IResult offers, you might be pleased to know that Oxpecker supports it as well. You can simplify returning responses together with status codes using Microsoft.AspNetCore.Http.TypedResults
:
open Oxpecker
open type Microsoft.AspNetCore.Http.TypedResults
let johnDoe = {|
FirstName = "John"
LastName = "Doe"
|}
let app = [
route "/" <| text "Hello World"
route "/john" <| %Ok johnDoe // returns 200 OK with JSON body
route "/bad" <| %BadRequest() // returns 400 BadRequest with empty body
]
The %
operator is used to convert IResult
to EndpointHandler
. You can also do the conversion inside EndpointHandler using .Write
extension method:
let myHandler : EndpointHandler =
fun (ctx: HttpContext) ->
ctx.Write <| TypedResults.Ok johnDoe
Writing HTML Strings
The WriteHtmlString (html: string)
extension method and the htmlString (html: string)
endpoint handler are both equivalent to writing text except that they set the Content-Type
header to text/html
:
let someHandler (dataObj: obj) : EndpointHandler =
fun (ctx: HttpContext) ->
task {
// Do stuff
return! ctx.WriteHtmlString "<html><head></head><body>Hello World</body></html>"
}
// or...
let someHandler (dataObj: obj) : EndpointHandler =
// Do stuff
htmlString "<html><head></head><body>Hello World</body></html>"
Writing HTML Views
Oxpecker comes with its own extremely powerful view engine for functional developers (see Oxpecker View Engine). The WriteHtmlView (htmlView : HtmlElement)
extension method and the htmlView (htmlView : HtmlElement)
HTTP handler will both compile a given html view into valid HTML code and write the output to the response stream of the HTTP request. Additionally they will both set the Content-Length
HTTP header to the correct value and set the Content-Type
header to text/html
:
let indexView =
html() {
head() {
title() { "Oxpecker" }
}
body() {
h1(id="Header") { "Oxpecker" }
p() { "Hello World." }
}
}
let someHandler : EndpointHandler =
fun (ctx: HttpContext) ->
task {
// Do stuff
return! ctx.WriteHtmlView indexView
}
// or...
let someHandler : EndpointHandler =
// Do stuff
htmlView indexView
You can also use HTML streaming using htmlChunked
and htmlViewChunked
HTTP handlers and there corresponding WriteHtmlChunked
and WriteHtmlViewChunked
extension methods.
let indexView =
html() {
head() {
title() { "Oxpecker" }
}
body() {
h1(id="Header") { "Oxpecker" }
p() { "Hello World." }
}
}
let someHandler : EndpointHandler =
fun (ctx: HttpContext) ->
task {
// Do stuff
return! ctx.WriteHtmlViewChunked indexView
}
// or...
let someHandler : EndpointHandler =
// Do stuff
htmlViewChunked indexView
Warning: While being fast at runtime, using many long CE expressions might slow down your project compilation and IDE experience (see the issue), so you might decide to use a different view engine. There are multiple view engines for your choice: Giraffe.ViewEngine, Feliz.ViewEngine, Falco.Markup or you can even write your own! To plug in an external view engine you can write a simple extension:
[<Extension>]
static member WriteMyHtmlView(ctx: HttpContext, htmlView: MyHtmlElement) =
let bytes = htmlView |> convertToBytes
ctx.Response.ContentType <- "text/html; charset=utf-8"
ctx.WriteBytes bytes
// ...
let myHtmlView (htmlView: MyHtmlElement) : EndpointHandler =
fun (ctx: HttpContext) -> ctx.WriteMyHtmlView htmlView
Streaming
Sometimes a large file or block of data has to be send to a client and in order to avoid loading the entire data into memory a Oxpecker web application can use streaming to send a response in a more efficient way.
The WriteStream
extension method and the streamData
endpoint handler can be used to stream an object of type Stream
to a client.
Both functions accept the following parameters:
enableRangeProcessing
: If true a client can request a sub range of data to be streamed (useful when a client wants to continue streaming after a paused download, or when internet connection has been lost, etc.)stream
: The stream object to be returned to the client.eTag
: Entity header tag used for conditional requests (see Conditional Requests).lastModified
: Last modified timestamp used for conditional requests (see Conditional Requests).
If the eTag
or lastModified
timestamp are set then both functions will also set the ETag
and/or Last-Modified
HTTP headers during the response:
let someStream : Stream = ...
let someHandler : EndpointHandler =
fun (ctx: HttpContext) ->
task {
// Do stuff
return! ctx.WriteStream(
true, // enableRangeProcessing
someStream,
None, // eTag
None) // lastModified
}
// or...
let someHandler : EndpointHandler =
// Do stuff
streamData
true // enableRangeProcessing
someStream
None // eTag
None // lastModified
In most cases a web application will want to stream a file directly from the local file system. In this case you can use the WriteFileStream
extension method or the streamFile
http handler, which are both the same as WriteStream
and streamData
except that they accept a relative or absolute filePath
instead of a Stream
object:
let someHandler : EndpointHandler =
fun (ctx: HttpContext) ->
task {
// Do stuff
return! ctx.WriteFileStream(
true, // enableRangeProcessing
"large-file.zip",
None, // eTag
None) // lastModified
}
// or...
let someHandler : EndpointHandler =
// Do stuff
streamFile
true // enableRangeProcessing
"large-file.zip"
None // eTag
None // lastModified
All streaming functions in Oxpecker will also validate conditional HTTP headers, including the If-Range
HTTP header if enableRangeProcessing
has been set to true
.
Redirection
The redirectTo (location: string) (permanent: bool)
endpoint handler can be used to redirect a client to a different location when handling an incoming web request:
let webApp = [
route "/new" <| text "Hello World"
route "/old" <| redirectTo "https://myserver.com/new" true
]
Please note that if the permanent
flag is set to true
then the Oxpecker web application will send a 301
HTTP status code to browsers which will tell them that the redirection is permanent. This often leads to browsers cache the information and not hit the deprecated URL a second time any more. If this is not desired then please set permanent
to false
(302
HTTP status code) in order to guarantee that browsers will continue hitting the old URL before redirecting to the (temporary) new one.
Response Caching
ASP.NET Core comes with a standard Response Caching Middleware which works out of the box with Oxpecker.
If you are not already using one of the two ASP.NET Core meta packages (Microsoft.AspNetCore.App
or Microsoft.AspNetCore.All
) then you will have to add an additional reference to the Microsoft.AspNetCore.ResponseCaching NuGet package.
After adding the NuGet package you need to register the response caching middleware inside your application's startup code before registering Oxpecker:
let configureServices (services : IServiceCollection) =
services
.AddResponseCaching() // <-- Here the order doesn't matter
.AddOxpecker() // This is just registering dependencies
|> ignore
let configureApp (app : IApplicationBuilder) =
app
.UseStaticFiles() // Optional if you use static files
.UseAuthentication() // Optional if you use authentication
.UseResponseCaching() // <-- Before UseOxpecker webApp
.UseOxpecker webApp
After setting up the ASP.NET Core response caching middleware you can use Oxpecker's response caching http handlers to add response caching to your routes:
// A test handler which generates a new GUID on every request
let generateGuidHandler : EndpointHandler =
fun ctx -> ctx.WriteText(Guid.NewGuid().ToString())
let cacheHeader = Some <| CacheControlHeaderValue(MaxAge = TimeSpan.FromSeconds(30), Public = true)
let webApp = [
route "/route1" (responseCaching cacheHeader None None >=> generateGuidHandler)
route "/route2" (noResponseCaching >=> generateGuidHandler)
]
Requests to /route1
can be cached for up to 30 seconds whilst requests to /route2
have response caching completely disabled.
Note: if you test the above code with Postman then make sure you disable the No-Cache feature in Postman in order to test the correct caching behaviour.
Oxpecker offers in total 2 endpoint handlers which can be used to configure response caching for an endpoint.
In the above example we used the noResponseCaching
endpoint handler to completely disable response caching on the client and on any proxy server. The noResponseCaching
endpoint handler will send the following HTTP headers in the response:
Cache-Control: no-store, no-cache
Pragma: no-cache
Expires: -1
The responseCaching
endpoint handler will enable response caching on the client and/or on proxy servers. The
CacheControlHeaderValue
object will control the Cache-Control
directive.
Public = true
means that not only the client is allowed to cache a response for the given cache duration, but also any intermediary proxy server as well as the ASP.NET Core middleware. This is useful for HTTP GET/HEAD endpoints which do not hold any user specific data, authentication data or any cookies and where the response data doesn't change frequently.
Public = false
which means that only the end client is allowed to store the response for the given cache duration. Proxy servers and the ASP.NET Core response caching middleware must not cache the response.
The responseCaching
endpoint handler has two additional parameters: vary
and varyByQueryKeys
.
Vary
The vary
parameter specifies which HTTP request headers must be respected to vary the cached response. For example if an endpoint returns a different response (Content-Type
) based on the client's Accept
header (content negotiation) then the Accept
header must also be considered when returning a response from the cache. The same applies if the web server has response compression enabled. If a response varies based on the client's accepted compression algorithm then the cache must also respect the client's Accept-Encoding
HTTP header when serving a response from the cache.
let cacheHeader = Some <| CacheControlHeaderValue(MaxAge = TimeSpan.FromSeconds(30), Public = true)
// Cache for 30 seconds without any vary headers
publicResponseCaching cacheHeader None None
// Cache for 30 seconds with Accept and Accept-Encoding as vary headers
publicResponseCaching cacheHeader (Some "Accept, Accept-Encoding") None
VaryByQueryKeys
The ASP.NET Core response caching middleware offers one more additional feature which is not part of the response's HTTP headers. By default, if a route is cacheable then the middleware will try to return a cached response even if the query parameters were different.
For example if a request to /foo/bar
has been cached, then the cached version will also be returned if a request is made to /foo/bar?query1=a
or /foo/bar?query1=a&query2=b
.
Sometimes this is not desired and the VaryByQueryKeys
feature lets the middleware vary its cached responses based on a request's query keys.
The generic responseCaching
endpoint handler is the most basic response caching handler which can be used to configure custom response caching handlers as well as make use of the VaryByQueryKeys
feature:
responseCaching
(Some (CacheControlHeaderValue(MaxAge = TimeSpan.FromSeconds(30)))
(Some "Accept, Accept-Encoding")
(Some [| "query1"; "query2" |])
The first parameter is of type CacheControlHeaderValue.
The second parameter is an string option
which defines the vary
parameter.
The third and last parameter is a string[] option
which defines an optional list of query parameter values which must be used to vary a cached response by the ASP.NET Core response caching middleware. Please be aware that this feature only applies to the ASP.NET Core response caching middleware and will not be respected by any intermediate proxy servers.
Response Compression
ASP.NET Core has its own Response Compression Middleware which works out of the box with Oxpecker. There's no additional functionality or http handlers required in order to make it work with Oxpecker web applications.
Testing
Integration testing of an Oxpecker application follows the concept of ASP.NET Core testing. You can check out the examples of tests in this repository itself: Oxpecker.Tests
Product | Versions Compatible and additional computed target framework versions. |
---|---|
.NET | net8.0 is compatible. net8.0-android was computed. net8.0-browser was computed. net8.0-ios was computed. net8.0-maccatalyst was computed. net8.0-macos was computed. net8.0-tvos was computed. net8.0-windows was computed. |
-
net8.0
- FSharp.Core (>= 9.0.100)
- Microsoft.IO.RecyclableMemoryStream (>= 3.0.1)
- Oxpecker.ViewEngine (>= 1.0.0)
NuGet packages (1)
Showing the top 1 NuGet packages that depend on Oxpecker:
Package | Downloads |
---|---|
Oxpecker.OpenApi
OpenApi support for Oxpecker |
GitHub repositories
This package is not used by any popular GitHub repositories.
Version | Downloads | Last updated |
---|---|---|
1.1.2 | 137 | 12/21/2024 |
1.1.1 | 626 | 11/27/2024 |
1.0.0 | 376 | 11/19/2024 |
0.15.0 | 527 | 11/9/2024 |
0.14.3 | 218 | 11/6/2024 |
0.14.2 | 318 | 10/26/2024 |
0.14.1 | 2,505 | 8/23/2024 |
0.14.0 | 152 | 8/22/2024 |
0.13.1 | 247 | 8/13/2024 |
0.13.0 | 378 | 7/17/2024 |
0.12.0 | 126 | 7/16/2024 |
0.11.1 | 185 | 7/8/2024 |
0.11.0 | 120 | 7/5/2024 |
0.10.1 | 1,038 | 5/8/2024 |
0.10.0 | 744 | 4/29/2024 |
0.9.3 | 358 | 4/10/2024 |
0.9.2 | 153 | 4/5/2024 |
0.9.1 | 118 | 4/4/2024 |
0.9.0 | 161 | 3/23/2024 |
0.8.1 | 167 | 2/29/2024 |
0.7.1 | 244 | 2/12/2024 |
0.7.0 | 138 | 2/7/2024 |
0.6.1 | 129 | 2/5/2024 |
0.6.0 | 118 | 2/3/2024 |
0.5.1 | 121 | 1/26/2024 |
0.5.0 | 121 | 1/23/2024 |
0.4.0 | 129 | 1/22/2024 |
0.3.0 | 118 | 1/19/2024 |
0.2.0 | 123 | 1/15/2024 |
0.1.0 | 156 | 1/12/2024 |
Oxpecker.ModelValidation module added